Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 04:31

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Steelers Address Mason Rudolph Trump Rally Appearance In Email To Fans - TMZ
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Uh-Oh! Switch 2's New GameChat Feature Is Transcribing Bad Words - Nintendo Life
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Former church in Northern Kentucky now a heavenly home for sale - WWMT
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Boulder attack updates: Multiple people injured in 'act of terror,' FBI says - ABC News
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
Rob Thomson ejected, Luzardo roughed up against Brewers - Phillies Nation
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How long does it typically take for prices to return to normal after tariffs are removed?